If you ignore the partisan words, the following article written by Stephen Frank is extremely well-written, filled with clear arguments and solid evidences against SCA 5. I am not interested in the partisan battles between Democrat and Republican, but I am 100% against SCA 5, the most racist bill in California History.
See link:
http://capoliticalnews.com/2014/02/02/most-racist-bill-in-california-history-sca-5-by-democrat-senator-hernandez-forces-racism-as-criteria-to-entrance-to-uc-schools-limit-womens-enrollment-as-well/
If the link above does not work (since so many people want to open it and read it at the same time), see the full text posted below:
The Jew and Asian California University Quota Limitation Act
Richard Rider Rants, 2/1/14
This Associated Press “story” the U-T ran (at the bottom of this blog) is essentially the “cut and paste” version of the dishonest press release put out by proponents. The AP is no longer a press organization — it’s become largely a government “information” distribution channel. No fact checking allowed.
Here’s what the story says: “In 1995, minority students accounted for 38 percent of high school graduates and 21 percent of those entering as University of California freshmen, Hernandez said. By 2004, they made up 45 percent of high school graduates but 18 percent of incoming UC freshmen, he said, adding the gap is growing.”
But go look at the official stats of the demographics of 2013 incoming UC freshman:
http://www.ucop.edu/news/factsheets/2013/fall_2013_admissions_table3.pdf (end of the table)
So, what’s the percentage of incoming freshmen who are white (INCLUDING “other”)? 28.1% — well BELOW the percentage of whites in California (42.3%). And BTW, note that this table shows that the percentage of the selectively designated “oppressed” minority admissions is NOT shrinking — it’s remarkably level. The drop they ballyhoo is the ending in 1996 of the disastrous and discriminatory quota system that existed before we passed Prop 209 to make such discrimination illegal.
This bill is not about countering white privilege. It’s about setting up DE FACTO quotas for ASIANS — which constitute a (supposedly evil) disproportionately high 36% of admissions vs. 14.9% of the CA population. Apparently these Asian kids “act white” FAR better than even WHITE kids act white!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California
To make the numbers being used to justify the bill favorable, the affirmative action (not quotas, of course) sponsors made the Asians minority part of the “white” majority (which is not a majority). Ipso presto, discrimination abounds!!
Such racist dishonesty is breathtaking — until one realizes that, well, this IS California. It’s okay to discriminate against Asians in the Golden State — just as it was once acceptable to establish informal admission quotas on high-performing Jews at Ivy League colleges a century ago.
NOTE: Here’s an aspect of the bill that most will overlook. Included in this new stealth quota system bill is a redress of the longstanding grievance against gender discrimination. It’s gone on for generations and continues even today — ask any liberal.
But here’s the thing: The bill will require what amounts to discrimination against the gender that is too frequently admitted — you guessed, WOMEN.
In 2010 the UC system admitted 95,403 women and only 84,178 men — a PRIMA FACIE case confirming discrimination. I look forward to the innovative progressive implementation of this solution to gender discrimination.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/jan/31/tp-bid-to-undo-ban-on-using-race-at-schools/
See link:
http://capoliticalnews.com/2014/02/02/most-racist-bill-in-california-history-sca-5-by-democrat-senator-hernandez-forces-racism-as-criteria-to-entrance-to-uc-schools-limit-womens-enrollment-as-well/
If the link above does not work (since so many people want to open it and read it at the same time), see the full text posted below:
Most Racist Bill in California History? SCA 5 by Democrat Senator Hernandez—Forces Racism as Criteria to Entrance to UC Schools/ Limit Womens’ Enrollment As Well
California government schools policies are quickly resembling those of the 1950’s-60’s Alabama. Based on race, both States enrolled students based on race rather than qualifications. Racism, black or white is wrong—unless you are a Brown/Obama Progressive. Amazing how many white progressives think it is OK to enroll students based on race when their father and mother marched in Selma, Alabama against this form of racist policy.
Also, this expands the War on Women, since the new policies would LIMIT the number of women allowed in California government universities.
“The bill will require what amounts to discrimination against the gender that is too frequently admitted — you guessed, WOMEN.
In 2010 the UC system admitted 95,403 women and only 84,178 men — a PRIMA FACIE case confirming discrimination. I look forward to the innovative progressive implementation of this solution to gender discrimination.”
SCA 5 by Democrat Senator Hernandez may be the most racist bill introduced in a State legislature since the 1965 Civil Rights Act—it is openly and specifically racist. George Wallace would be proud of Hernandez—both Democrats, both racists.
Also, this expands the War on Women, since the new policies would LIMIT the number of women allowed in California government universities.
“The bill will require what amounts to discrimination against the gender that is too frequently admitted — you guessed, WOMEN.
In 2010 the UC system admitted 95,403 women and only 84,178 men — a PRIMA FACIE case confirming discrimination. I look forward to the innovative progressive implementation of this solution to gender discrimination.”
SCA 5 by Democrat Senator Hernandez may be the most racist bill introduced in a State legislature since the 1965 Civil Rights Act—it is openly and specifically racist. George Wallace would be proud of Hernandez—both Democrats, both racists.
The Jew and Asian California University Quota Limitation Act
Richard Rider Rants, 2/1/14
This Associated Press “story” the U-T ran (at the bottom of this blog) is essentially the “cut and paste” version of the dishonest press release put out by proponents. The AP is no longer a press organization — it’s become largely a government “information” distribution channel. No fact checking allowed.
Here’s what the story says: “In 1995, minority students accounted for 38 percent of high school graduates and 21 percent of those entering as University of California freshmen, Hernandez said. By 2004, they made up 45 percent of high school graduates but 18 percent of incoming UC freshmen, he said, adding the gap is growing.”
But go look at the official stats of the demographics of 2013 incoming UC freshman:
http://www.ucop.edu/news/factsheets/2013/fall_2013_admissions_table3.pdf (end of the table)
So, what’s the percentage of incoming freshmen who are white (INCLUDING “other”)? 28.1% — well BELOW the percentage of whites in California (42.3%). And BTW, note that this table shows that the percentage of the selectively designated “oppressed” minority admissions is NOT shrinking — it’s remarkably level. The drop they ballyhoo is the ending in 1996 of the disastrous and discriminatory quota system that existed before we passed Prop 209 to make such discrimination illegal.
This bill is not about countering white privilege. It’s about setting up DE FACTO quotas for ASIANS — which constitute a (supposedly evil) disproportionately high 36% of admissions vs. 14.9% of the CA population. Apparently these Asian kids “act white” FAR better than even WHITE kids act white!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California
To make the numbers being used to justify the bill favorable, the affirmative action (not quotas, of course) sponsors made the Asians minority part of the “white” majority (which is not a majority). Ipso presto, discrimination abounds!!
Such racist dishonesty is breathtaking — until one realizes that, well, this IS California. It’s okay to discriminate against Asians in the Golden State — just as it was once acceptable to establish informal admission quotas on high-performing Jews at Ivy League colleges a century ago.
NOTE: Here’s an aspect of the bill that most will overlook. Included in this new stealth quota system bill is a redress of the longstanding grievance against gender discrimination. It’s gone on for generations and continues even today — ask any liberal.
But here’s the thing: The bill will require what amounts to discrimination against the gender that is too frequently admitted — you guessed, WOMEN.
In 2010 the UC system admitted 95,403 women and only 84,178 men — a PRIMA FACIE case confirming discrimination. I look forward to the innovative progressive implementation of this solution to gender discrimination.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/jan/31/tp-bid-to-undo-ban-on-using-race-at-schools/
No comments:
Post a Comment